Be informed that “corporate” a$$ert$ these GMO mo$quitoe$ are absolutely environmentally “safe” … Mon$anto and the “Supreme$” $wear…

…Be informed that “corporate” a$$ert$ these GMO mo$quitoe$ are absolutely environmentally “safe” … Mon$anto and the “Supreme$” $wear…

GMO Mosquitoes May Be Released in the U.S. for First Time

By Wenonah Hauter, Barry Wray, Food & Water Watch

Biotech firm Oxitec have given no evidence to support claim that the modified insects will reduce dengue fever. READ MORE»

 

…Remember it is solely your decision whether this information is sufficiently “vetted” & by whom…

became profit which is sanctioned as America’s holiest grail…

…But that’s OK because it went to corporate and became profit which is sanctioned as America’s holiest grail…

Pentagon Can’t Account for $1 Billion in Afghanistan Emergency Reconstruction Aid

James Rosen, McClatchy: A total of $1.3 billion that the Pentagon shipped to its force commanders in Afghanistan between 2004 and 2014 for the most critical reconstruction projects can’t be accounted for by the Defense Department. Sixty percent of all such spending was under an emergency program.    Read the Article 

 

…Remember it is solely your decision whether this information is sufficiently “vetted” & by whom…

Certainly appears to be a fair query … wonder what their answer is….?

…Certainly appears to be a fair query … wonder what their answer is….?

Why does Washington Post, USA Today, NPR and the AP get its ‘science’ talking points from a convicted felon who went to prison for Medicaid fraud?

 

Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/049476_mainstream_media_Dr_Oz_Medicaid_fraud.html#ixzz3YG2khMxb

 

In recent days, Columbia University’s School of Journalism announced its 2015 Pulitzer Prize winners, and the list contained many of the usual suspects.

The New York Times picked up a couple more awards for a political corruption story, Ebola coverage and international reportage;The Wall Street Journal won for an investigative hit piece against healthcare providers who manipulate Medicare; the Los Angeles Times won for reporting how the state’s extreme drought has affected the "human condition"; a smaller South Carolina paper won a prize for reporting violence against women; the St. Louis Post-Dispatchpicked up a Pulitzer for photography during the Ferguson riots; some guy won the Poetry Pulitzer for revealing the "scope of African-American experience" through poems that drew from "slave narratives."

And so forth. In other words, these mainstream papers "went after" stories where reporters and editors had already decided the outcome, and as usual, Columbia University rewarded their pre-conceived orthodoxy as members of the journalistic "cool kids club."

Dr. Oz no longer a "cool kid"  Why does this matter? Because it helps explain how a man like Dr. Oz could be so savagely attacked by a media so willing to pile on this suddenly not-so-cool kid without bothering to actually investigate the charges being made against him and, more importantly, by whom: When you’re out of "the club," the cool kids have already decided you must be guilty as charged because that sounds about right.

As noted by U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), a non-profit organization advocating for more openness in the food industry, recent hit pieces against Dr. Mehmet Oz, host of a popular daytime television program that often focuses on bogus conventional health treatments and alternative medicine choices, were perpetrated willingly by a mainstream media too trusting of "establishment" medical sources, most likely because Dr. Oz doesn’t toe the cool club line.

As USRTK noted in a press release about the Dr. Oz criticism:    The 55-point headline in Slate blares, "Letter from Prominent Doctors Implies Columbia Should Fire Dr. Oz for Being a Quack." The story by Ben Mathis-Lilly is based on a letter by a group of doctors who want Columbia University to relieve Dr. Oz of his position as vice chair of the department of surgery at Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons.

"Dr. Oz has repeatedly shown disdain for science and for evidence-based medicine, as well as baseless and relentless opposition to the genetic engineering of food crops," says the letter, which was sent soon after Dr. Oz aired a show about glyphosate, the herbicide associated with most genetically engineered crops that was recently designated as a probable human carcinogen by the World Health Organization.

The complaint to Columbia was signed by Dr. Henry I. Miller and nine colleagues, "all of whom are distinguished physicians," the letter claims.

Media attacks when narrative fits a pre-conceived notion of "The Truth"    But are they really? As Dr. Bob Arnot, the chief medical correspondent for NBC News, noted during an appearance on CNN following the release of the letter, the attack against Dr. Oz appeared to be generated by the "doctors" more beholden to the GMO industry:

[T]he most interesting part of this is this letter. First of all, it’s not from the Columbia faculty. It’s from ten physicians, all of whom have industry ties. And if you look carefully at the letter, what it’s really about is that the industry is furious that he has taken on genetically modified crops. So you basically have industry henchmen who are after Dr. Oz here. One of them in fact, head of the American Council on Science and Health, spent some time in federal prison for Medicaid fraud, so I’d be very careful about who has written this letter. [emphases added]

USRTK has the skinny on the entire list of ten "impartial" doctors here.    The point is, the mainstream media — always out to protect its PC credentials — leapt on this story without first investigating it properly because it "fit" a pre-conceived "cool kid club" narrative, namely, that anyone who dares question the safety of genetically modified anything is a "quack" whose reputation has to be destroyed.

Now, on to the next racially motivated riot and "investigation" into what is affecting the "human condition."

Sources:
http://usrtk.org
http://www.npr.org
http://www.latimes.com
http://www.naturalnews.com



…Remember it is solely your decision whether this information is sufficiently “vetted” & by whom…

I seriously doubt it is only Chinese who have “tweaked” genes of human embryos…

…I seriously doubt it is only Chinese who have “tweaked” genes of human embryos…

 

Chinese scientists just admitted to tweaking the genes of human embryos

A group of Chinese scientists just reported that they modified the genome of human embryos, something that has never been done in the history of the world, according to a report in Nature News.

A recent biotech discovery – one that has been called the biggest biotech discovery of the century – showed how scientists might be able to modify a human genome when that genome was still just in an embryo.

This could change not only the genetic material of a person, but could also change the DNA they pass on, removing "bad" genetic codes (and potentially adding "good" ones) and taking an active hand in evolution.

Concerned scientists published an argument that no one should edit the human genome in this way until we better understood the consequences after a report uncovered rumours that Chinese scientists were already working on using this technology.    Read Full Story

FOR THE FIRST TIME, RESEARCHERS EDIT THE GENES OF HUMAN EMBRYOS
04-23-2015  •  http://www.popsci.com, By Alexandra Ossola
RUMORS THAT THIS RESEARCH WAS UNDERWAY TURN OUT TO BE TRUE 

…Remember it is solely your decision whether this information is sufficiently “vetted” & by whom…

If you remember nothing else … remember “citizen united” … “Supreme$” declare corporate holy grail

…If you remember nothing else … remember “citizen united” … “Supreme$” declare corporate holy grail…

 

House Passes Cybersecurity Bill Despite Privacy Protests

04-23-2015  •  http://www.wired.com, ANDY GREENBERG CONGRESS IS HELLBENT on passing a cybersecurity bill that can stop the wave of hacker breaches hitting American corporations. And they’re not letting the protests of a few dozen privacy and civil liberties organizations get in their way.

…Remember it is solely your decision whether this information is sufficiently “vetted” & by whom…

America’s ruling 1% will never permit one of their very own feeling the full weight and measure of America’s courts system … they leave that for the “unwashed” – 99% – yea, you and me…

…America’s ruling 1% will never permit one of their very own feeling the full weight and measure of America’s courts system … they leave that for the “unwashed” – 99% – yea, you and me…

To Send a Message, Judge Sentences David Petraeus to 75% of One Speaking Fee

04-24-2015  •  http://antiwar.com, Marcy Wheeler
Former CIA Director David Petraeus just got sentenced to two years of probation for leaking highly sensitive information to his mistress and then lying to the FBI about it. 

David Petraeus Is Sentenced to Probation in Leak Investigation
04-24-2015  •  nytimes.com
A federal judge on Thursday sentenced David H. Petraeus, a former C.I.A. director and the highest-profile general from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, to two years’ probation for providing classified information to a woman with whom he was havi

David Petraeus Gets 2 Years Probation for Sharing Classified Info With Mistress — Why Don’t Whistleblowers Get Off So Easy?

AFP

The Justice Department had previously said that Petraeus acknowledged giving sensitive information to his mistress. READ MORE»

 

…Remember it is solely your decision whether this information is sufficiently “vetted” & by whom…

our so called department of ju$tice dream$ up these “horse-shit” propaganda claims

…Who in our so called department of ju$tice dream$ up these “horse-shit” propaganda claims…As we sit idly by while our government leaders bully to “muzzle” Edward Snowden, WikiLeaks, Bradley Manning, et. al. … And we dare to claim America as the land of the free and the home of the brave … in reality we’ve become “chicken-shit”…

 

Department of Justice Claims Grossly Disparate Treatment Will "Promote Respect for the Law"

 

Marcy Wheeler, Expose Facts: The same DOJ that recommends David Petraeus should go virtually unpunished for sharing far more sensitive information with Paula Broadwell says that whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling should go to prison for decades to set an example.      Read the Article 

 

…Remember it is solely your decision whether this information is sufficiently “vetted” & by whom…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers