damn sure is NOT our Congre$$ … ! ! !



… Laugh but “we” allow our US Senators & Representatives PRIVILEGE$ denied to us … why…?

Do we see them as the sovereign…?

Who does stand for the little people … damn sure is NOT our Congre$$ … ! ! ! 



… OK … enough … put on your ‘dunce’ cap




… OK … enough … put on your ‘dunce’ cap … WE … damn sure deserve it …

We did NOT hold anyone accountable or responsible and we wonder why this happened on our watch…?

Maricopa County Supervisors did nothing …

Maricopa County Attorney did nothing …

Maricopa County Manager did nothing …

Free PRESS did not disclose … no transparency …

And we went to ball games … drank beer … and watched “foxy” new$ …


… Propaganda or different perspective … view it then conclude …

… Propaganda or different perspective … view it then conclude …

This film is informative and accurate to me in every way except for in its dated, partisan, naivete.


Bruce Gagnon repetitively identifies the damaging effects of certain US policies with the first and second Bush administrations, when these policies have been wholly carried forward by the Obama Administration and were already well-established during the Clinton & Reagan Eras – and prior…like Ike Eisenhower warned us about. …”This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.”

We’re talking about Global Corporatism. Got a problem with that?


View video below about one hours in length … informative … but you judge it for yourself …


Quite a compelling indictment



… Quite a compelling indictment of USDA/FDA … “big” pharma …. “big” AG … can you spell … MON$ANTO & CONGRE$$ … joined at the hip … to serve and protect … 


Nearly Half of U.S. Meat Tainted With Drug-Resistant Bacteria

Posted By Dr. Mercola | May 07 2011  http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/05/07/nearly-half-of-us-meat-tainted-with-drugresistant-bacteria.aspx


Drug-resistant bacteria may be lurking in your grocery meat aisle. A study found that Staphylococcus aureus, the bacteria that causes most staph infections, was present in meat and poultry from U.S. grocery stores at "unexpectedly high rates."

Researchers found nearly half of the meat and poultry samples were contaminated. What’s more, over half of those bacteria were resistant to at least three classes of antibiotics.

According to the New York Post:

“For the study, researchers looked at 136 samples involving 80 brands of beef, chicken, pork and turkey from 26 grocery stores … According to the findings … industrial farms, where food animals are steadily fed low doses of antibiotics, ‘are ideal breeding grounds for drug-resistant bacteria that move from animals to humans.’”


clip_image004  Clinical Infectious Disease May 2011; 52(10):1227-30 

clip_image004[1]  New York Post April 15, 2011 



Mr. Carey … loss of life is NOT a concern to Arizona government …



… While I share Mr. Carey’s concern I rise to note that “self-certification” has become Arizona government’s favored method of exercising their oversight of bu$ine$$ … especially in the water and wastewater industry … so why not allow architects, contractors, engineers to enjoy the same…?

Look around Phoenix and Arizona is NOT really concerned about the health and welfare of its people …

We “balance” our Enron type state budget solely on the back$ of those Arizona citizens least able to afford it … while exonerating bu$ine$$ from its fair share of taxe$ …

Our “professional” sport entertainment is housed in facilities “we” the taxpayer$ provide … while paying exorbitant prices for admission … food … beverage … only to further enhance these corporate owner$ bank account$ …

Our state educational system ranks just above Mississippi and our health care system just eliminated about 300,000 sending them to the emergency room$ …

As our Governor and her Republican/GOP/Tea Party controlled legislature line their campaign coffer$ from the friend$ of the Fiesta Bowl … Correction Corporation of America (CCA) …

Arizona governments have been short-changing its voters/citizens for year …

Mr. Carey … loss of life is NOT a concern to Arizona government …



Unless “we” find voice


… Unless “we” find voice this mine venture will unquestioningly allow havoc on Arizona’s fragile environment … Congre$$ is owned … so expecting them to place meaningful environmental safeguards on any mine or oil endeavor is fundamentally flawed and foolish …

1,200 jobs at what long term co$t … for how many live$ … and in the end “we” once again pick up the cleanup as the mine walk$ away …  and “we” term this progre$$…?


… Welcome to ‘agent-orange’s” (John Boehner) GOP/Tea Party … definition of democracy …


image… Welcome to ‘agent-orange’s” (John Boehner) GOP/Tea Party … definition of democracy …


Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home


INDIANAPOLIS | Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.

In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer’s entry.

"We believe … a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," David said. "We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest."

David said a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail and has plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system.

The court’s decision stems from a Vanderburgh County case in which police were called to investigate a husband and wife arguing outside their apartment.

When the couple went back inside their apartment, the husband told police they were not needed and blocked the doorway so they could not enter. When an officer entered anyway, the husband shoved the officer against a wall. A second officer then used a stun gun on the husband and arrested him.

Professor Ivan Bodensteiner, of Valparaiso University School of Law, said the court’s decision is consistent with the idea of preventing violence.

"It’s not surprising that they would say there’s no right to beat the hell out of the officer," Bodensteiner said. "(The court is saying) we would rather opt on the side of saying if the police act wrongfully in entering your house your remedy is under law, to bring a civil action against the officer."

Justice Robert Rucker, a Gary native, and Justice Brent Dickson, a Hobart native, dissented from the ruling, saying the court’s decision runs afoul of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

"In my view the majority sweeps with far too broad a brush by essentially telling Indiana citizens that government agents may now enter their homes illegally — that is, without the necessity of a warrant, consent or exigent circumstances," Rucker said. "I disagree."

Rucker and Dickson suggested if the court had limited its permission for police entry to domestic violence situations they would have supported the ruling.

But Dickson said, "The wholesale abrogation of the historic right of a person to reasonably resist unlawful police entry into his dwelling is unwarranted and unnecessarily broad."

This is the second major Indiana Supreme Court ruling this week involving police entry into a home.

On Tuesday, the court said police serving a warrant may enter a home without knocking if officers decide circumstances justify it. Prior to that ruling, police serving a warrant would have to obtain a judge’s permission to enter without knocking.

Indiana: Full Frontal Fascism
Larken Rose

   If you live in Indiana, you now have no rights at all. Just thought you should know.