call me a “doubting-thomas” where’s the proof

…if this is not just smoke and mirrors and will not harm my body in any way … I’m all for it … but call me a “doubting-thomas” where’s the proof

New chemical makes teeth ‘cavity proof’ – and could do away with dentist visits forever

The chemical could even be added to foods to stop bacteria damaging teeth as you eat. The researchers hope to license the patent to chemical giants such as Procter and Gamble.

 

”the” Donald like all good story tellers only gives you those portion of the story which highlight and accentuate him leaving the efforts of others who prop him up and bailed his butt out never mentioned … like you and me

…”the” Donald like all good story tellers only gives you those portion of the story which highlight and accentuate him leaving the efforts of others who prop him up and bailed his butt out never mentioned … like you and me ..

clip_image001

 

Exposing How Donald Trump Really Made His Fortune: Inheritance from Dad and the Government’s Protection Mostly Did the Trick

 

 

By Brian Miller and Mike Lapham, Berrett-Koehler Publishers
Posted on July 10, 2012, Printed on July 12, 2012

http://www.alternet.org/story/156234/exposing_how_donald_trump_really_made_his_fortune%3A_inheritance_from_dad_and_the_government%27s_protection_mostly_did_the_trick

In March 2011 Forbes estimated Donald Trump’s net worth to be $2.7 billion, with a $60 million salary. Many praise and analyze his “success” as if it were self-made, and they fail to attribute the proper credit to others in society where it is deserved. Despite what Trump may espouse, his success would have been in no way possible without his father, the general public, and the US government. Unfortunately, Trump decided to forget or selectively ignore these truths while forming his political philosophy, a sentiment made particularly clear during his brief bid for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination.

Trump was born in New York City in 1946, the son of real estate tycoon Fred Trump. Fred Trump’s business success not only provided Donald Trump with a posh youth of private schools and economic security but eventually blessed him with an inheritance worth an estimated $40 million to $200 million. It is critical to note, however, that his father’s success, which granted Donald Trump such a great advantage, was enabled and buffered by governmental financing programs. In 1934, while struggling during the Great Depression, financing from the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) allowed Fred Trump to revive his business and begin building a multitude of homes in Brooklyn, selling at $6,000 apiece. Furthermore, throughout World War II, Fred Trump constructed FHA-backed housing for US naval personnel near major shipyards along the East Coast.

In 1974 Donald Trump became president of his father’s organization. During the 15 years following his ascension, he expanded and innovated the corporation, buying and branding buildings, golf courses, hotels, casinos, and other recreational facilities. In 1980 he established The Trump Organization to oversee all of his real estate operations.

Trump eventually found himself in serious financial trouble. In 1990, due to excessive leveraging, The Trump Organization revealed that it was $5 billion in debt ($8.8 billion by some estimates), with $1 billion personally guaranteed by Trump himself. The survival of the company was made possible only by a bailout pact agreed upon in August of that same year by some 70 banks, allowing Trump to defer on nearly $1 billion in debt, as well as to take out second and third mortgages on almost all of his properties. If it were not for the collective effort of all banks and parties involved in that 1990 deal, Trump’s business would have gone bankrupt and failed.

In 1995 Trump took Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Inc. public and received a substantial financial boost from society and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations that enable the market to function. He initially sold 10 million shares at $14 per share and then in 1996 sold 13.25 million shares at $32.50 a share. This initial public offering granted Trump’s company a stability and legitimacy that would have been impossible without millions of people around the world trusting his organization and investing with the hope of shared success.

Despite the clear societal and governmental assistance described above, Trump continues to be outspoken in his criticism of government. In his book The America We Deserve, Trump explains that “the greatest threat to the American Dream is the idea that dreamers need close government scrutiny and control. Job one for us is to make sure the public sector does a limited job, and no more.” This quote proves to be particularly ironic when considering Trump’s feelings about eminent domain laws. He was quoted as saying, “I happen to agree with it 100 percent” when speaking of the 2005 Supreme Court decision on Kolo v. New London, which affirmed the government’s ability to transfer land from one private owner to another for the purpose of economic development in the area. In fact, Trump attempted to take advantage of eminent domain laws on multiple occasions, once even demanding that an elderly widow give up her home so that he could build a limousine parking lot.

Perhaps more disturbing than his hypocritical condemnation of the government is his failure to acknowledge anyone’s contributions, save his own, in the creation of his success. At the 2011 Conservative Political Action Conference, Trump made clear his feelings on the creation of his wealth: “Over the years I’ve participated in many battles and have really almost come out very, very victorious every single time. I’ve beaten many people and companies, and I’ve won many wars. I have fairly but intelligently earned many billions of dollars, which in a sense was both a scorecard and acknowledgment of my abilities.” Furthermore, Trump apparently sees no benefit in supporting taxes to maintain institutions such as the Securities and Exchange Commission to regulate the stock market, in which he publicly trades his company, or the court system, which actively protects his property rights: “We are the highest taxed nation—I would tax foreign countries that are ripping off the US and lower taxes for Americans.”

From the moment of his birth, Trump was set up for success. The large inheritance left to him by his father, coupled with the contributions and the protections of society and the US government made his ascension to the Forbes 400 list almost inevitable. Nevertheless, Trump fails to recognize this phenomenon and continues to express his belief that he did it alone.

 

OUR ELECTIONS ARE NO MORE FAIR THAN THE ONE MEXICO JUST CONCLUDED …

… HOW MANY COMPUTER EXPERTS NEED TO TESTIFY BEFORE “WE” DEMAND THOSE WE ELECTED TO SERVE AND TO PROTECT US ACTULLY DO JUST THAT … YES … UTILIZING COMPUTERS ONLY OUR ELECTIONS ARE NO MORE FAIR THAN THE ONE MEXICO JUST CONCLUDED …

clip_image001

 

Not Again! How Our Voting System Is Ripe For Theft and Meltdown in 2012

The Republican war on voters is only the start of really big problems voters face in the 2012 presidential election

.READ MORE ..Steven Rosenfeld / AlterNet

 

EMBARASSMENT TO ARIZONA

…IT’S NOT JUST GOP TEA PARTY GOVERNOR JAN BREWER WHO IS AN EMBARASSMENT TO ARIZONA IT’S OUR REPUBLICAN TEA-PARTY CONGRESSMEN LIKE TRENT FRANKS … WHERE’S THE PROOF, DUDE …?

Arizona Representative Trent Franks Accuses Obama Administration of Being Infiltrated by Muslim Brotherhood

 

 

we keep electing the same dopes

…OK … but when we keep electing the same dopes to represent us over and over and over again … Einstein noted that doing the same thing over and over and over again expecting different results is INSANITY … and our actions would suggest we are insane ….

92% of Americans want GMO labels on their foods. Sign this petition if you’re one of them:
http://www.naturalnews.com/036450_GMO_food_labels_petition.html

 

 

the people are going in different direction

 

clip_image002[4]

…Arizona’s leader ought to turn around and take a close look behind them as the parade they think they are leading appears t be a parade of one … themselves … the people are going in different direction and thank God for that …

 

 

What is true in Arizona is the homeowner essentially is penalized for “excessive” water usage … while AG … Industry … Golf Courses … are treated for the most part with kid-gloves. What remains a mystery is Arizona does NOT have a state-wide water conservation law and one is essentially free at least in Phoenix to allow water to run down the street … 112 degree summer days and we have Tempe Town Lake which evaporates at the minimum 72 inches of water per year over its entire surface … couple that with an unknown number of substantive “water-features” located throughout the Valley of the Sun and that’s a hell of big number

…What is true in Arizona is the homeowner essentially is penalized for “excessive” water usage … while AG … Industry … Golf Courses … are treated for the most part with kid-gloves.  What remains a mystery is Arizona does NOT have a state-wide water conservation law and one is essentially free at least in Phoenix to allow water to run down the street … 112 degree summer days and we have Tempe Town Lake which evaporates at the minimum 72 inches of water per year over its entire surface … couple that with an unknown number of substantive “water-features” located throughout the Valley of the Sun and that’s a hell of big number … 

Deep Blue Pockets

 

By: Cutright, Elizabeth  Tuesday, July 10, 2012 3:06 PM … http://www.waterefficiency.net/WE/Blogs/1398.aspx

 

When sources have been tapped out, and demand keeps rising, one of the oldest tricks in the water conveyance professional’s handbook is matching price to usage. This can work in one of two ways—through incentives or penalization.

 

Most rate structures are designed to penalize big water users (and wasters). Your bill goes up—sometimes hitting designated pricing tiers—as your consumption increases. It’s a familiar tug-of-war and can be an effective deterrent to rampant water waste. Of course, there will always be those users with pockets big enough to absorb even the heftiest price tag, but for the typical consumer—including the large scale commercial or industrial complex—pricing is enough to influence behavior

So what do you think? Is progressive pricing the way to go when it comes to legislating water efficiency? Or do incentives have a better chance of succeeding? And do either of these practices do enough to encourage smart water resource management?