NOT of any importance that Americans will not have health insurance

..What do U not understand…???  

… For Trump and GOP it is NOT of any importance that Americans will not have health insurance … what is important is that Trump/GOP repeal Obamacare as they cannot allow a Democrat President … especially a “black” one … to champion a FDR “new deal” health care…!!!

The Daily 202: House committees set to advance ACA replacement before knowing cost or how many lose coverage

 James Hohmann March 7 at 10:33 AM

 

…So is the Washington Post now also a “fake” … “altenrative fact” … news outlet…???

clip_image002…So is the Washington Post now also a “fake” … “altenrative fact” … news outlet…???

Huffington Post caught removing positive reviews of "Vaxxed" documentary

 

03-07-2017 http://www.naturalnews.com    (Natural News) It seems that the Huffington Post has continued to block or censor articles that don’t align perfectly with the media outlet’s views — especially when it comes to the documentary, Vaxxed. Almost exactly one year ago — in April of 2016, the same publication was caught censoring positive reviews of the film about vaccines. Now, the Leftist mainstream media site is at it again.

British writer Sally Beck reports that she had written two articles pertaining to the film recently. Her first article, titled, "Vaxxed: should we watch this film?" was published on Huff Po’s U.K. site on February 21st. She went on to co-write a second article, "The MMR vaccine: why it’s sensible to worry about the way it has been regulated," and it was published shortly after the first.

The article on the documentary itself was primarily an overview of the film’s content, while the second article served to express support for parents who are concerned about the MMR vaccine. Both articles respectfully acknowledged the CDC whistleblower, William Thompson, and other figures in the "anti-vax" community, such as Andrew Wakefield and Brian Hooker.

These articles have, of course, since been removed from the Huffington Post websites. And it is far from the first time that Huff Po has censored content. Last year, Lance Simmens — who had reportedly written nearly 200 articles for Huffing Post over 8 years — had his review of the Vaxxed documentary removed almost immediately after its publication. What’s more, Simmens also reported that his login credentials were blocked.

Simmens describes himself as having a strong liberal streak, but that the movie had inspired him to call for a more open, national dialogue regarding the allegations put forth by the documentary. This alone was enough to cause him to be censored by a far-left news site — which in and of itself speaks volumes about the Left-wing ideologies taking hold in this country. They aren’t even willing to entertain the idea of discussion — and suggesting so, even with an abundance of evidence is enough to get you fired.

Simmens expressed his frustration at the fact that his article was removed without any sort of explanation. "It never crossed my mind that this might be some sort of censorship because it has never happened to me and the article, while provocative, is not beyond any bounds of journalistic or political propriety," Simmens explained.

Unsurprisingly, this was not the only act of censorship perpetrated by Huff Po in 2016. Another writer for the publication, David Seaman, claims that he too was banned by the site — only this time, it was for daring to highlight the concerns surrounding the health of Hilary Clinton. Seaman says that he had published hundreds of articles for the site, and never had any problems until he wrote two stories that  questioned the health of the Democratic presidential candidate. …Read Full Story

 

…I do not believe for one minute that there were NOT times when Obama stepped over the line…

…I do not believe for one minute that there were NOT times when Obama stepped over the line…

Andy McCarthy  ….The Obama camp’s disingenuous denials on FISA surveillance of Trump

  First, as Obama officials well know, under the FISA process, it is technically the FISA court that “orders” surveillance. And by statute, it is the Justice Department, not the White House, that represents the government in proceedings before the FISA court. So, the issue is not whether Obama or some member of his White House staff “ordered” surveillance of Trump and his associates. The issues are (a) whether the Obama Justice Department sought such surveillance authorization from the FISA court, and (b) whether, if the Justice Department did that, the White House was aware of or complicit in the decision to do so. Personally, given the explosive and controversial nature of the surveillance request we are talking about – an application to wiretap the presidential candidate of the opposition party, and some of his associates, during the heat of the presidential campaign, based on the allegation that the candidate and his associates were acting as Russian agents – it seems to me that there is less than zero chance that could have happened without consultation between the Justice Department and the White House.

Second, the business about never ordering surveillance against American citizens is nonsense. Obama had American citizens killed in drone operations. Obviously, that was not done in the U.S. or through the FISA process; it was done overseas, under the president’s commander-in-chief and statutory authority during wartime. But the notion that Obama would never have an American subject to surveillance is absurd.

Third, that brings us to a related point: FISA national-security investigations are not like criminal investigations. They are more like covert intelligence operations – which presidents personally sign off on. The intention is not to build a criminal case; it is to gather information about what foreign powers are up, particularly on U.S. soil. One of the points in FISA proceedings’ being classified is that they remain secret – the idea is not to prejudice an American citizen with publication of the fact that he has been subjected to surveillance even though he is not alleged to have engaged in criminal wrongdoing.

Read the Article

 

…Whose dime did you think it was…it damn sure was not corporate’$$$…???

…Whose dime did you think it was…it damn sure was not corporate’$$$…???

Brute Force at Standing Rock Was on Taxpayers’ Dime

Read the Article at The Center for Investigative Reporting

 

Why should this be a surprise as “WE” elected “The Groper “ our President…

…Why should this be a surprise as “WE” elected “The Groper “ our President…

YOUR TSA SECURITY PAT-DOWN IS ABOUT TO GET ‘MORE INTIMATE THAN EVER BEFORE’ Note to self: Stop wearing leggings to the airport. [HuffPost

IF, AND/OR WHEN WE GET DETAILS… THINK WE WILL EVER GET FULL DISCLOSURE & TRANSPARENCY ON THE “TRUMPCARE” PLAN…???

…IF, AND/OR WHEN WE GET DETAILS… THINK WE WILL EVER GET FULL DISCLOSURE & TRANSPARENCY ON THE “TRUMPCARE” PLAN…???

You’re On Your Own: Republicans Plan Attack on Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security

Eleanor J. Bader, Truthout: This month, Republican lawmakers will use the budget process to begin repealing the Affordable Care Act, which is expected to adversely impact Medicaid and dual Medicaid/Medicare beneficiaries. After that, they plan to cut benefits and change eligibility rules for Medicare and Social Security. We need a sustained campaign of resistance to this right-wing war on social programs.

Read the Article 

 

The fact this is being revealed to us insuch apeice meal fashion suggests that a “petri-dish-humanoid” has already been created…

…The fact this is being revealed to us insuch apeice meal fashion suggests that a “petri-dish-humanoid” has already been created…

Embryo Breakthrough: Artificial Human Life Now Possible In Lab

 

03-07-2017 https://www.technocracy.news, BY: SARAH KNAPTON    Cambridge University mixed two kinds of mouse stem cells and placed them on a 3D scaffold. After four days of growth in a tank of chemicals designed to mimic conditions inside the womb, the cells formed the structure of a living mouse embryo.

The breakthrough has been described as a ‘masterpiece’ in bioengineering, which could eventually allow scientists to grow artificial human embryos in the lab without the need for a sperm or an egg.

Growing embryos would help researchers to study the very early stages of human life so they could understand why so many pregnancies fail, but is likely to prove controversial and raise ethical questions about what constitutes human life.

urrently scientists can carry out experiments on leftover embryos from IVF treatments, but they are in short supply and must be destroyed after 14 days. Scientists say that being able to create unlimited numbers of artificial embryos in the lab could speed up research while potentially removing some of the ethical boundaries.  ……Read Full Story