Whether this information provides sufficient proof and is sufficiently independently “vetted” is for you to determine … but … in any event it “clouds” the quick assessment and conclusions currently offered

...Whether this information provides sufficient proof and is sufficiently independently “vetted” is for you to determine … but … in any event it “clouds” the quick assessment and conclusions currently offered…

 

The Las Vegas Massacre: the media narrative is deceptive

“Cram them full of non-combustible data, chock them so damned full of ‘facts’ they feel stuffed, but absolutely brilliant with information. Then they’ll feel they’re thinking, they’ll get a sense of motion without moving.” – Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451, 1951“It is not only information that they need-in the age of Fact, information often dominates their attention and overwhelms their capacities to assimilate it….What they need , and what they… …..Read full article at NexusNewsfeed.com website »

 

MIKE ADAMS: FORENSIC ACOUSTIC PROOF OF SECOND SHOOTER

 

Taking the FBI up on their request for help from the public, Mike Adams did exactly what needed to be done, here. Using the timecodes from the clearly-audible cellphone videos of the Las Vegas Shooting, he measured the times when the bullets are heard hitting the pavement versus their "reports," when coming out of the gun barrels.

 

Yes that’s plural. Using basic Junior High School geometry, he took 1) the approximate speed of bullets traveling out of the guns (975 meters/sec., based on a Remington rifle, so not an exact match for the guns used but roughly 3X faster than sound); versus 2) the speed of sound at 20% humidity (345meters/sec.); 3) the low-pitched report sounds; versus 4) the high-pitched pavement strikes.Finding the difference between all of these, he was able to calculate that one shooter ofthat evil sustainedautomatic gunfire that we’ve all now heard so many times was indeedshooting at the same distance from the festival audience as the Mandalay Bay hotel tower, at 425-475 meters away, while a second shooter was clearlycloser to the targeted concertgoers, at 250-275 meters away. This doesn’t rule out additional shooters firing from these same general distances.

 

He proposes three locations for the "second shooter" on the opposite side of the concert venue. Based on what we see and hear in this video, I’d go with thesecond location that he proposes, somewhere in the direction of the vacant lot acrossGiles Street or the Oasis Apartments, located diagonally to the audience.

 

The FBI and the Mainstream Media want to pretend that people are so dumbeddown and math-challenged that they can’t figure out something as basic and straightforward as this, hewing stubbornly to their idiotic and easily disprovable claims that one "Lone Nut" somehow committed this atrocity. The contempt for science and common sense on display have been a replay of so many violations that we saw on 9/11. One wonders if citizen investigators like Mike Adams will be able to own the narrativeor get streamrolled by the lying government once again.

Video: (29 mins):Mike Adams: Forensic Acoustic Proof of Second Shooter

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: